Syed Ilyas Hussaini, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/2865/2015 · 2025-01-08
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22943 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22943 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010323642015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 2865/2015 Between: Syed Ilyas Hussaini, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A M QURESHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE (AP)
2. VENKATESWARLU VALMIKI
3. SHAIK MOHAMMAD(SC FOR AP WEB)
4. SHAIK KHAJA BASHA The Court made the following:
ORDER: Sri Mohd. Naseeruddin, learned counsel representing Sri A.M. Qureshi,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
8th January, 2025 knr
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION No.2865 of 2015 8th January, 2024
knr