Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22942 (BOM)

BAPU EKNATH MARKAD AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/9899/2017 · 2025-02-18

Shri Kishore C Sant

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ethape ( 1 ) 53-WP-9899-2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 53 WRIT PETITION NO. 9899 OF 2017 Bapu Eknath Markad And Others VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Mr. Yuvraj V. Kakde, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. P. P. Dawalkar, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. P. R. Nagare Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4A to 4E and 5 to 9. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J. DATE : 18th FEBRUARY 2025 PC :- 1. Learned Advocate for the petitioners, on instruction, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy. 2. Leave granted with liberty as prayed for. 3. Needless to say that, the time consumed in prosecuting this writ petition shall be excluded while considering the question of limitation period. 4. Writ Petition stands disposed off as withdrawn. 5. Pending civil applications, if any, also stand disposed off. [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] 2025:BHC-AUG:4768