Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22941 (PAT)

Ajhar Ansari v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./15093/2025 · 2025-07-09

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15093 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-324 Year-2024 Thana- BIHARIGANJ District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1 . Ajhar Ansari S/O Samrej Ansari R/O Vill.- Damka, Ansari Tola, Mohan Kunda, Dist.- Purnea 2. Samrej Ansari S/O Late Alauddin Ansari @ Bhangi Ansari R/O Vill.- Damka, Ansari Tola, Mohan Kunda, Dist.- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1 . The State of Bihar 2. Tarana Khatoon W/O Majhar Ansari R/O Vill.- Rahua, P.S.- Bihariganj, Dist.- Madhepura ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Renu Kumari , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 09-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 115 ( 2 ), 126 ( 2 ), 75 , 352, 351 ( 2 ), 3 (5) 85 of BNS and 3/ 4 of the D. P Act. 3. As per prosecution case , daughter of informant was married with co-accused Majhar Ansari in the year 2023 and after the marriage, she was subjected to cruelty and harassment by all the accused persons due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and ultimately ousted her from matrimonial house . Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15093 of 2025(3) dt.09-07-2025 2/2 4. Petitioners are in -laws of the victim. They are simply victims of over implication . Allegation is general and omnibus against these petitioners. No specific overt act is alleged against these petitioners. Thrust of the accusation is against husband of the victim. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the family affairs of victim and her husband. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners. 6. However, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate Madhepura in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case No. 324 of 2024 , subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 ( 2 ) of BNSS 2023 . Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T