Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22930 (DEL)

DIVYA PANDEY AND ANR v. NATIONAL EDUCATION SOCIETY FOR TRIBAL STUDENTS

W.P.(C)/9826/2024 · 2025-03-28

Prateek Jalan

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) 9771/2024 & Connected Matters $~56 to 60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9771/2024 (Disposed of case) KM SUNEETA RAJ AND ORS .....Petitioners versus NATIONAL EDUCATION SOCIETY FOR TRIBAL STUDENTS .....Respondent + W.P.(C) 10018/2024 (Disposed of case) PARMAR SAMRAGNIBEN BABULAL .....Petitioner versus NATIONAL EDUCATION SOCIETY FOR TRIBAL STUDENTS .....Respondent + W.P.(C) 10031/2024 (Disposed of case) VAGHMASHI URMILABEN BABUBHAI .....Petitioner versus NATIONAL EDUCATION SOCIETY FOR TRIBAL STUDENTS .....Respondent + W.P.(C) 9803/2024 (Disposed of case) SAYMA .....Petitioner versus NATIONAL EDUCATION SOCIETY FOR TRIBAL STUDENTS .....Respondent This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/04/2025 at 14:00:33 W.P.(C) 9771/2024 & Connected Matters + W.P.(C) 9826/2024 (Disposed of case) DIVYA PANDEY AND ANR .....Petitioners versus NATIONAL EDUCATION SOCIETY FOR TRIBAL STUDENTS .....Respondent Appearance:- Mr. S.K. Rungta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prashant Singh, Advocates for Petitioners in Item Nos. 56 to 60. Mr. Amartya Ashish Sharan & Mr. Akash Kishore, Advocates for NESTS. [M:-9654659775] Mr. Jagdish Chandra, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Shubham Kumar Mishra & Mr. Tushar Arora, Advocates for UOI in Item Nos. 56 to 60. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN O R D E R % 02.04.2025 1. A typographical error in the order of this Court dated 28.03.2025, has been brought to my attention as a result of which these matters have been listed today at my instance. 2. Learned counsel for the parties are present. 3. The error is in paragraph 2 of the order, to the extent that it has been directed that formalities for issuance of appointment letters/posting orders to the petitioners would be completed within the outer limit of three weeks. This is a typographical error – learned counsel on both sides accept that the order was for completion of formalities within three months. 4. Paragraph 2 of the order dated 28.03.2025 is accordingly corrected, and will read as follows:- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/04/2025 at 14:00:33 W.P.(C) 9771/2024 & Connected Matters “2. Mr. Rungta submits that the necessary appointment letters/posting orders be also issued expeditiously. Ms. Dave, assures the Court that this will be done as expeditiously as possible, subject to completion of all formalities, and within the outer limit of three months.” 5. This order be read as part of the order dated 28.03.2025. PRATEEK JALAN, J APRIL 2, 2025 ‘pv’/kb/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/04/2025 at 14:00:33