1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6041 of 2025 1 - Rakesh Bhawal S/o Late K.P. Bhawal Aged About 47 Years Posted And Working As Assistant Teacher (Lb) At Govt. Primary School Majira, Block - Surajpur, Distt. - Surajpur Chhattisgarh 2 - Basant Kumar Mandal S/o Late Niranjan Mandal Aged About 42 Years Posted And Working As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Nawapara Haripur, Block - Surajpur, Distt. - Surajpur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh 6 - Block Education Officer Block Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh 7 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.07.17 10:51:25 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 16/07/2025 1. The claim of the petitioners in the present petition is with regard to grant of 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that with regard to award of the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has been issued by the respondent/State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of “Smt Sona Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and others” in WA No. 261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue. The petitioners are also entitled for the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to respondents/ competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioners, this petition, at this stage, is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in the writ petition to respondents/competent authority annexing all relevant documents, and judgment of this Court passed in WA No. 3 261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law, considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023 within further period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case, and it is for respondents/competent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 6. With this observation, the present writ petition stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika