Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22928 (CAL)

MADHUSUDAN SEN v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

WPA/8744/2011 · 2025-02-06

Ananya Bandyopadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

N.22Sl 151/CL 06.02.25 Sl-23 Ct.33 (S.R.) WPA 8744 of 2011 Madhusudan Sen v. Union of India & Ors. Mr. Sumit Kr. Panja Mr. Sumit Roy … for the respondent nos.6 & 7. Mr. Ranjay De, Sr. Adv. Mr. B. Banerjee Mr. A.A. Bose … for the respondent no.8/WBSEDCL. On 31st January, 2025 when the matter was called for none appeared for the petitioner and no accommodation was sought for. Today, also none appears for the petitioner and no accommodation has been sought for though the learned advocates appearing for the respondent nos.6, 7 and 8 are present. In view thereof, the instant writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)