GAFUR URF GABBU S/O PEER MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8442/2025 · 2025-08-29
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22926 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22926 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:34632] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8442/2025 Gafur @ Gabbu S/o Peer Mohammad, R/o Badi Masjid Ke Pass, Bus Stand Suket, Police Station Suket, Tehsil Ramganjmandi, District Kota (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman Mr. Iftikhar Ansari For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 29/08/2025
1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Gafur @ Gabbu S/o Peer Mohammad in FIR No. 163/2025 dated 11.06.2025 registered at P.S. Suket District – Kota Rural, whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Sections 3, 4 of Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance and Sections 4, 25 of Arms Act & Section 112(2) of BNS.
2. The applicant was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for petitioner further submits that total 30 cases were registered
[2025:RJ-JP:34632] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8442/2025] against the petitioner accused and out of which all 30 were
disposed of. He further submitted that except 4 cases, remaining cases were registered under Section 13 of RPGO and this petitioner is fined on pleading guilty. He further submitted that the petitioner accused is in custody and a charge-sheet has been filed.
4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor.
5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record.
6. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of
facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-accused.
7. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants- accused Gafur @ Gabbu S/o Peer Mohammad, is hereby allowed and ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law.
[2025:RJ-JP:34632] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8442/2025] (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled.
8. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /69