Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22923 (KAR)

LUCKMAN SHARIFF v. MOHIN PATHAN

MFA/3615/2017 · 2025-07-17

C M Poonacha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S.CHAUHAN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO 3615 OF 2017 BETWEEN LUCKMAN SHARIFF AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O S A WAHAB, R/AT NO.201,5TH CROSS, C-LAYOUT BANNIMANTAP, MYSURU-570 015. ... APPELLANT (By Sri. P NATARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND 1. MOHIN PATHAN @ MOMIN PATHAN, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, S/O NASIR PATHAN, R/AT A P KUMBARAWADA, BEED TALUK AND DISTRICT-431 122, MAHARASHTRA STATE. 2. REGIONAL MANAGER ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO LTD., NO.133, 3RD FLOOR, SHIKA TOWERS, MFA.No.3615/2017 ------------------------ 2 RAMAVILAS ROAD, MYSURU-570 002. ... RESPONDENTS This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 173(1) of MV ACT against the judgment and award dated:17.01.2017 passed in MVC NO.828/2014 on the file of the JUDGE, PRINCIPAL COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, M.A.C.T., MYSURU, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following: ORDER The learned counsel for the appellant is granted three weeks time to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed automatically without reference to the Court. Sd/- JUDGE MFA.No.3615/2017 ------------------------ 3 NOTE: Vide Court Order dt. 01.09.2017, Office objections are not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. T By: DKS R By: AV COPY C By: KTY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR