Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22922 (AP)

T Rama Rao v. State of AP

WP/15056/2018 · 2025-03-17

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA WRIT PETITION Mn- 15056 pp AMARAVATI iJO JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Between: T. Rama Rao, S/o Desaih, Aged 36 years, Occ: Field Asst Pererrdsam Panchayat, KVB Puram, Chittor District R/o Perendsam Village, Chittoor District ^ NREGS, ...PETITIONER AND 1. State of A.P., Secretariat Hyderabad 2. The District Programme Co Ordinator, Management Agency Chittoor District, 3. The Project Director, District Water District, Chittoor 4. The Mandal Praja Parishad Development Officer District rep by its PrI. Secretary, Rural Development Department District Collector District Water Chittoor Management Agency, Chittoor , KVB Puram, Chittoor ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the the circumstances stated i Constitution of India praying that in in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ or direction of Mandamus declaring the the appeal pending before the 2 may more particularly in the nature of writ action of the respondents in not disposing of nd respondent since 6-3-2017 even after the petitioner is appeared before the 2^^ submitted the evidences respondent on 11-4-2017 and arbitrary, discriminatory, highhanded vmlatron of pnncpies of natural Justice and cannot be Justified in the eye of law and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner into service as Field Asst of Perendsam Grampanchayat Chittoor Dist with all KVB Puram Mandal consequential benefits in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF ?ni« Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances in support of the petition, the High Court may b4 pleased to direct the Respondents to reinstate and continue the Petitioner in service as Field Asst of Perumdesam Grampanchayat, KVB Puram Mandal, Chittor Dist by suspending the operation of the impugned proceedings No A4/1897/2016 dt 31-12-2016 i Pending disposal of the above Writ issued by Respondent Petition forth with in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH. Counsel for the Respondent No.1 ■ SRINIVAS GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos 2 & 3: SRI M.S.R. CHANDRA MURTHY, * SC FOR MGNREGS Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI M. SUDHIR, SC FOR ZPP, MPP & GRAM PANCHAYAT The Court made the following: ORDER 'T T 1 APHC010323722018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15056/2018 Between: ...PETITIONER T Rama Rao AND ...RESPONDENT{S) State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.CH SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1 .GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: " to issue a Writ, order or direction more particulariy one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not disposing of the appeal pending before the 2”'^ respondent since 6-3-2017 even after the petitioner is appeared before the 2" respondent on 11-4-2017 and submitted the evidences as iilegai, arbitrary, discriminatory, highhanded, vioiation of principles of natural justice and cannot be justiifed in the eye of iaw and consequentiy direct the respondents to continue the petitioner into service as Field Asst of Perendsam Grampanchayat, KVB Puram Mandal, Chittoor Dist 2 pass such other 2. Heard Sri Ch.Srinivas, learned M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned Standing Counsel Learned counsel for the petitioner would with the 2"^respondent since 06.03.2017 and a direction respondents for disposal of the appeal. 4. Learned Standing Counsel for the 4^^ Court may pass appropriate orders. counsel for the petitioner and Sri for the 4*^ respondent. 3. submit that appeal is pending may be given to the respondent would submit that the 5. Considering the submissions made, directing respondent No.2 to dispose of the weeks from the date of receipt of a of by this day. There shall be the Writ Petition is disposed of appeal within a period of four (04) copy of this order, if appeal is not disposed no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 'i / //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The PrI. Secretary, Panchayat Raj &Rural Development Department, State of A.P., Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Programme Co Ordinator, District Collector District Water Management Agency Chittoor District, Chittoor 3. The Project Director, District Water Management Agency, Chittoor District, Chittoor 4. The Mandal Praja Parishad Development Officer, KVB Puram, Chittoor District 5. One CC to Sri Ch. Srinivas, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri M.S.R. Chandra Murthy, SC for MGNREGS[OPUC] 7. One CC to Sri M. Sudhir, SC for ZPP, MPP & Gram Panchayat[OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT 9. Three CD Copies. ssb . HIGH COURT DATED: 17/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.15056 of 2018 g 0! APR 2025 ^ . Cutreni section m »*a DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS