SRI. KESHAVAMURTHY .G v. M/S KUSUMABARA VIVIDODESHA SOUHARDHA
CRL.P/4853/2025 · 2025-04-02
S R Krishna Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22920 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22920 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14414 CRL.P No. 4853 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4853 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
SRI. KESHAVAMURTHY G., S/O.GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT 'ANJANA GANGA NILAYA', 1ST 'B' CROSS, HANUMANTHAPURA MAIN ROAD, ADARSHANAGAR, TUMAKURU – 572 103. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. R.V. SHIVANANDA REDDY, ADV.) AND:
M/S KUSUMAMBARA VIVIDODESHA SOUHARDHA SAHAKARI (N) HAVING ITS OFFICE NO.154, 5TH MAIN, APMC YARD, YESHWANTHPURA, BENGALURU – 560 022.
REPTD.BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI. M.V.GOWRISHANKAR …RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS) TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 28.03.2025 IN C.C.NO.34794/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE 26TH ACJM AT BENGALURU, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 138 OF N.I ACT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14414 CRL.P No. 4853 of 2025
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be disposed of as withdrawn reserving liberty in favor of the petitioner to cross- examine respondent – plaintiff in relation to the additional documents permitted by the Trial Court in the impugned order and also reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to adduce further oral and documentary evidence in support of his defence. It is also submitted that liberty may be reserved in favour of the petitioner to raise objections with regard to the admissibility, relevance, proof, probative value, proof, etc., in respect of the additional documents produced by the respondent.
2. The said submission is placed on record.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the petition stands
disposed of as withdrawn reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to cross-examine the respondent in relation to the additional documents permitted by the Trial Court in the impugned order and also raise objections with regard to the admissibility, relevance, proof, probative value, proof, etc., in respect of the additional
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:14414 CRL.P No. 4853 of 2025
documents produced by the respondent, which shall be considered by the Trial Court after hearing both sides, in accordance with law.
Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
SV List No.: 3 Sl No.: 4