[2025:RJ-JP:8702] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.23/2025 Santosh Shankar Rao Patil S/o Shankar Lal Tataya Saheb Patil, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Mahanideshak Sahakarita Mishan, Address- Nhq Icom, Plot Number 110, Pocket 27, Sector 24, Rohini, New Delhi At Presently Residies C-201, Amit Bloom Field Ambe Ganv Near Naval Bridge, Pune, Thana Bharti Vidhyapith Katraz, District Pune, Maharashtra. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP Mr. Ravindra Singh, SHO, Vaishali Nagar Jaipur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 27/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 364/2022, registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Jaipur (West) for the offences under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The main allegation of conspiracy, creating forged documents and extorting money from various persons by duping them are against other co- accused Upendra Singh Rudradev, Gyan Prakash, Lallan Kumar, [2025:RJ-JP:8702] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-23/2025] Ranjan Kumar, Kajal Jha, Rajni Singh and Sokhilal and the entire amount obtained from various complainant was deposited in the account maintained by co-accused Upendra Singh Rudradev. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 22.10.2023 and the trial of the case may take considerable time. Charge-sheet has already been produced. The offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner are triable by Magistrate, therefore, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the grant of bail application. It is contended the accused-petitioner is habitual offender and against him 19 cases have been registered. The allegations against the accused-petitioner are grave, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. The allegation of procuring the money from various complainant by assuring them to be appointted in the company is against the other co-accused namely Upendra Singh Rudradev. The entire amount procured from various complainants were also deposited in the account maintained by the other co-accused. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 22.10.2023 and charge- sheet has already been produced before the concerned Court and the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. In similar nature of cases already registered against the present accused-petitioner, he has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders dated 19.03.2024, 29.04.2024, 26.09.2024 and 12.12.2024, therefore considering the above facts, without expressing anything on the merit of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:8702] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-23/2025] 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Santosh Shankar Rao Patil S/o Shankar Lal Tataya Saheb Patil, in connection with FIR No. 364/2022, registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Jaipur (West), shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned Police Station. The SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner to the trial Court, every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-68