Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22918 (KAR)

SRI. RAMAIAH (DEAD) v. RAMAKRISHNAPPA

RSA/1244/2020 · 2025-04-26

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:17590 RSA No. 1244 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1244 OF 2020 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMAIAH (DEAD) REPRESENTED BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES SMT. SHARADAMMA (DEAD) W/O. LATE RAMAIAH, REPRESENTED BY HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES, SRI. MUNIRAJU S/O. LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDENT OF GONURKOPPA VILLAGE, LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK – 571 213 2. SRI. VENKATESH S/O. LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, RESIDENT OF GONURKOPPA VILLAGE, LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK – 571 213 3. SMT. NARAYARAMMA D/O. LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDING AT KARAPALLI, NANADIMANGALA POST, HOSUR TALUK, TAMIL NADU - 635109 Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:17590 RSA No. 1244 of 2020 4. SMT. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA D/O. LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT CHIKKA KADATHUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK 56130 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHANNABASAPPA S N., ADVOCATE) AND: RAMAKRISHNAPPA S/O. MUNISWAMY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT GONUR KOPPA VILLAGE, LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK – 571213. …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.11.2019 PASSED IN RA.No.252/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE MALUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.10.2010 PASSED IN OS No.242/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) MALUR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants after arguing the matter for some time, filed a memo seeking leave of - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:17590 RSA No. 1244 of 2020 this Court to withdraw the appeal and file a Review Petition before the first appellate Court. Memo is placed on record. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE BVK