Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22909 (KAR)

SRI S DYAMAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/40731/2019 · 2025-03-20

N S Sanjay Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11641 WP No. 40731 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 40731 OF 2019 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI S DYAMAPPA S/O ALTE PUTTASIDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURIEST, R/AT KENKERE VILLAGE, DODDKITTADHALLI POST, MADADA KERE HOBLI, HOSADURGA (TQ), CHITRADURGA(DIST) 57557. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MARUTHI G B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRICNCIPAL SECRTARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 577501. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 577501. 4. THE THASILDAR HOSADURGBA, CHITRADURGA (DISTRICT) 577501. 5. THE LAND GRANT COMMITTEE RERPESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11641 WP No. 40731 of 2019 HOSADURGA, HOSDAURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 577527. 6. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR NADA KACHRI MADADAKERE, HOSADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 577527. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. CHANDINI.S., HCGP FOR R-1 TO R-6) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 12.07.2012, 09.06.2015, 23.07.2015, 10.08.2015 AND 04.06.2016 MADE BY THE PETITIONER FOR REGULARISATION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION TO THE RESPONDENTS AND THEREBY DIRECTING TO ISSUE SAGUVALI CHIT (GRANT CERTIFICATE) IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONER, THE SAME ARE MARKED AT ANNX-G TO G4, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The prayer in this Writ Petition is to issue a direction to respondents to consider the representations, by which the petitioner is seeking for regularization of his unauthorized occupation. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11641 WP No. 40731 of 2019 2. Learned A.G.A., on instructions, submits that though there is an inter se dispute between the brothers, the application filed by the petitioner would be considered in accordance with law within a period of three months. 3. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondents No.4 and 5 to take necessary action to consider the application of the petitioner for regularization of his unauthorized occupation within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. It is clarified that nothing said in the said order shall be construed as an opinion being rendered on the merits of the claim of the petitioner. 5. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE HNM, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37