Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010323572024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 16265/2024 Between:
1. NARRA RAJA SEKHAR BABU, S/O NARRASYAM PRASAD, AGED 41 YEARS, R/O 14/6, CINNAMON LIFE RESIDENCE TOWER, 100, GLENNIE STREET, COLOMBO 02, 00200 TEMPORARILY RESIDING AT D.NO. 504, CAPITAL EMPIRE, KANURU, PENAMALURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI - 110001. 2. BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER IMMIGRATION, EAST BLOCK,
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR, PENAMALURU URBAN P.S., KRISHNA DISTRICT
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PENAMALURU URBAN P.S., KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
SRS,J W.P.No.16265 of 2024
pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly a writ In the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 authorities in issuing Lookout Circular (LOC) against the Petitioner bearing Indian Passport No. V8536976 at the instance of Respondent No.3 illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violative of Articles. 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India besides being violative of Office Memorandum No. 25016/10/2017-lmm(Pt.), Ministry of Home Affairs, dated- 22.02.2021 issued by Respondent No.1 and Passport Act, 1967 and consequently to set aside the same and further direct the 3rd Respondent to communicate the closure of LOC to the Respondent No.2 herein as per the procedure laid down under Office Memorandum dt.
22.02.2021 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the Lookout Circular (LOG) issued against the Petitioner bearing Indian Passport No. V8536976 and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 to communicate the suspension of the Lookout Circular (LOC) issued against the Petitioner bearing Indian Passport No. V8536976 to Respondent No.2 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. JAVVAJI SARATH CHANDRA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. Page 3 of 5 SRS,J W.P.No.16265 of 2024
The Court made the following:
:: ORDER ::
The above writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No.2 in issuing Lookout Circular (LOC) against the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Heard Sri J. Sarath Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Umadevi, learned Standing Counsel, appeared for respondents 1 & 2 and Sri Ajay, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appeared for respondents 3 to 5. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a criminal case was registered against the petitioner and others in Cr.No.946 of 2022 of Penamuluru PS. Later, the issue was settled and the said crime was quashed by order dated 20.08.2024 in Crl.P.No.5511 of 2024. The copy of the order is placed before this Court. 4. Sri Ajay, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, submitted the instructions of Sub-Inspector of Police, Penamuluru PS dated 15.03.2025. As seen from the instructions, the Sub-Inspector of Police addressed a letter to the Joint Director, Immigration Branch (B), Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi vide letter in C.No.207/LOC/C2/2023, dated 17.08.2024, to take necessary steps to cancel the LOC.
In response, by letter dated 22.08.2024, the Bureau of Immigration authorities informed about the deletion of LOC against the petitioner. 5. Thus, as seen from the instructions, the LOC issued against the petitioner has been deleted. Hence, no further adjudication is required in the writ petition. Page 4 of 5 SRS,J W.P.No.16265 of 2024
6. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 17.03.2025 TVN
SRS,J W.P.No.16265 of 2024
153 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.16265 OF 2024
Date : 17.03.2025 TVN