Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 229062 (MAD)

Santhanamery v. The Principal Accountant General

WP(MD)/29359/2025 · 2025-10-23

K Kumaresh Babu

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD).No.29359 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.10.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU W.P.(MD).No.29359 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD).No.22693 of 2025 Santhanamery ...Petitioner -Vs- 1. The Principal Accountant General (Accounts and Entitlements) Tamil Nadu 361, Anna Salai Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018. 2. The District Elementary Educational Officer District Elementary Education Office Kulithalai, Karur, Karur District. 3. The Additional Assistant Elementary Educational Officer Mahadhanapuram Karur District. 4. The Treasury Officer Treausry Office Kulithalai Karur District. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD).No.29359 of 2025 5. The Branch Manager Principal Public Account Officer (Pension) Karur District. 6. The Tahsildar Kulithalai Karur District. 7. Reginamary ...Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the letter of the 2nd respondent dated 14.06.2025 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 5 to accord family pension in favour of the petitioner on account of the death of her husband D. Muthu and thus render justice. For petitioner : Mr.M.Charles Kamalesh For Respondent No.1 : M/s.S.Mahalakshmi Standing Counsel For Respondent Nos.2 to 6 : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Addl. Government Pleader ORDER This writ petition is filed challenging the letter of the 2nd respondent dated 14.06.2025 and seeking consequential direction to the respondent Nos.1 to 5 to accord family pension in favour of the petitioner on account of the death of her husband D. Muthu. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD).No.29359 of 2025 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that there is no opportunity given to the petitioner before the proposal has been forwarded by the Government as indicated in the order impugned in the writ petition. 3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the first respondent has placed on record a proceedings of the first respondent dated 26.08.2025, wherein, pension had been sanctioned in favour of the 7th respondent. 4. In view of the same, there is no further adjudication is required to be made in the writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed, with a liberty to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings of the 1st respondent dated 26.08.2025. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 23.10.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes/No gvn 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD).No.29359 of 2025 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. gvn To 1. The Principal Accountant General (Accounts and Entitlements) Tamil Nadu 361, Anna Salai Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018. 2. The District Elementary Educational Officer District Elementary Education Office Kulithalai, Karur, Karur District. 3. The Additional Assistant Elementary Educational Officer Mahadhanapuram Karur District. 4. The Treasury Officer Treausry Office Kulithalai Karur District. 5. The Branch Manager Principal Public Account Officer (Pension) Karur District. 6. The Tahsildar Kulithalai Karur District. W.P.(MD).No.29359 of 2025 23.10.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis