IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 13040/2025 Decided on: 13.08.2025 Moti Ram & Anr. …Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the issue involved in this writ petition is covered by State of H.P. & Ors. Vs. Surajmani & Ors.2 Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners have filed representations on 21.05.2025 (Annexure P-3- colly) to the respondents/competent authority for the redressal of their grievances raised in this writ petition. Learned counsel also submitted that the petitioners would be content, in case, respondents/competent 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 SLP (C) No.23016/2023 decided on 06.02.2025 2 authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid decision, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 3. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law and in terms of the above decision, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 13th August, 2025(rohit)