Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22904 (GAU)

Sh. Khamkhanmanga v. Union of India and 5 Ors.

WP(C)/84/2024 · 2025-05-01

Nelson Sailo

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC030005062024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/84/2024 Sh. Khamkhanmanga S/o Vungzakhena (L) R/o Ngaizawl, Champhai District. (Owner of Periodic Patta No.3091/12/10/19 of 1996) VERSUS Union of India and 5 Ors. R/b the Secretary to the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Govt. of India, Transport Bhawan, 1, Parliament Street, New Delhi- 110001 2:National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (NHIDCL) a fully owned company of the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways Govt. of India r/b the Managing Diriector (Projects) having its corporate office at 3rd Floor PTI Building 4 Parliament Street New Delhi- 110001 3:The General Manager NHIDCL having its regional Office at 3rd Floor T-86 Tuikhuahtlang Aizawl Mizoram- 796001 4:The General Manager (Project) NHIDCL Seling Mizoram- 796001 5:The Competent Authority for Land Acquisition (CALA)/ Additional Deputy Commissioner Champhai District Page No.# 2/3 Mizoram- 796701 6:The Deputy Commissioner/ District Collector Champhai District Mizora Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. TC Zothansanga Advocate for the Respondent : Ms Zairemsangpuii, CGC for R1 ORDER B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO 02.05.2025 Mr. T.C. Zothansanga, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a meeting was held in the Office Chamber of the ADC/CALA, Keifangtlang on 08.11.2024 between all the stake holders and the meeting was chaired by the Addl. DC & CALA, Champhai. He submits that the parties have come to an amicable settlement in terms of the minutes recorded in the said meeting which was duly signed by the parties concerned. In this connection, the learned counsel has produced the meeting minutes dated 08.11.2024. The learned counsel therefore submits that he has instructions not to press the Writ Petition. Ms. Zairemsangpuii, learned CGC appearing for respondent No. 1, Ms. Vanneihsiami, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for respondent No. 6 and Mr. C. Zoramchhana, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4 agreed Page No.# 3/3 to the submission. In view of above, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as not pressed. Since the meeting minutes dated 08.11.2024 is not satisfactorily legible, the learned counsel for the petitioner shall submit a typed copy of the meeting minutes alongwith a photocopy of the original before the Registry within the course of the day, and the same shall be marked as ‘X’ for identification. JUDGE Comparing Assistant