OM PARKASH GROVER v. KAMAL KISHOR YADAV AND OTHERS
COCP/650/2025 · 2025-04-07
Harkesh Manuja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22902 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22902 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 COCP-650-2025
155 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-650-2025 (O&M) Decided on:07.04.2025
Om Parkash Grover
.... Petitioner
versus
Kamal Kishor Yadav and others
.... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Navdeep Singh Virk, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. H.S.Jugait, Advocate for respondent No.3.
Mr. Aman Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.5.
****
Harkesh Manuja, J. (Oral)
CM-6990-CII-2025
Application is allowed as prayed and compliance affidavit of Tripti Gupta, IA&AS, Accountant General (A&E), Punjab, Chandigarh along with Annexure R-3/2 filed on behalf of respondent No.3 is taken on record. Main case
1.
Learned State counsel has filed the Compliance report by way of an affidavit of Lalita Sharma, Principal Government Senior Secondary School, Ladda, District Sangrur on behalf of respondents No.1, 2 and 4. The same is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
2.
In view of compliance report, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present petition, however, seeks liberty to challenge the speaking order dated 04.04.2025 in accordance with law.
3.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed being not pressed SONIA BURA 2025.04.08 15:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 COCP-650-2025
with aforesaid liberty.
4.
Rule stands discharged.
5.
Pending application, if any, also stands
disposed of.
07.04.2025
(HARKESH MANUJA) sonia
JUDGE
Whether speaking/non-speaking?
Yes/No Whether reportable?
Yes/No
SONIA BURA 2025.04.08 15:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document