Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22898 (KAR)

M/S MADDALLA INDUSTRIES v. M/S. MY VAN (P) LTD

CRL.RP/604/2020 · 2025-01-13

H P Sandesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1161 CRL.RP No. 604 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.604 OF 2020 BETWEEN: M/S MADDALLA INDUSTRIES BLOCK NO. 43, PLOT NO.5, IDA, AUTO NAGAR, GUNTUR-522 001, ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PARTNER, M.V.V. RAGHAVAIAH …PETITIONER (BY SRI MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: M/S. MY VAN (P) LTD FORMERLY M/S. MYSORE VANIJAY PVT. LTD., REGD OFFICE 3RD FLOOR, SHERIFF HOUSE, NO. 85, RICHMOND ROAD, BANGALORE-560 025, REP. BY ITS MANAGER - ACCOUNTS (SRI. SUNIL KOTHARI) BANGALORE-560 025. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI M ARUN PONNAPPA, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1161 CRL.RP No. 604 of 2020 THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED 02.04.2019 PASSED BY THE XX ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XVIII ADDL.C.M.M., AND M.A.C.T., BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.6830/2017 AND EXECUTE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The counsel for the petitioner is absent. In the previous date of hearing also the counsel for the petitioner was absent. The counsel for the respondent is present today as well as on the last date of hearing. This Court vide order dated 02.09.2022, when the petitioner’s counsel did not appear before the Court, directed the Trial Court to take steps to execute the impugned order since 50% of the fine amount has not been deposited and the conditions imposed by this Court are not complied by the petitioner as per the order this Court dated 29.09.2020. Inspite of the said order, the counsel for the petitioner is - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1161 CRL.RP No. 604 of 2020 not pursuing the matter diligently. Hence, there is no ground to adjourn the matter once again. This petition is of the year 2020 which is filed against the concurrent finding passed by the Trial Court as well as the First Appellate Court. In view of not prosecuting the matter diligently, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN