Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22892 (ORI)

PANDABA SAHOO v. ASWATHY S., SECY. DEPT., HEALTH AND F.W, ODISHA

CONTC/1330/2025 · 2025-07-29

S K Panigrahi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.1330 of 2025 Pandaba Sahoo …. Petitioner(s) Mr. Swoyam Prabhu Jena, Adv. -versus- Aswathy S. & Ors. …. Opposite Party(s) Mr. Rajdeep Pradhan, Adv. CORAM: HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI Order No. ORDER 29.07.2025 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. This CONTC arises out of the judgment/order dated 12.08.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No.34388 of 2020. 3. Heard learned counsel for the Parties. 4. At the outset, learned counsel for the Opposite Parties/Contemnors, on instruction, submits that challenging the judgment/order dated 12.08.2024 passed in the above noted Writ Petition a Writ Appeal vide W.A. No.755 of 2025 has been preferred which is still pending before the Division Bench of this Court. 5. In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to entertain the prayer made in this CONTC. However, considering the submission of learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court directs the Petitioner to make an attempt for early disposal of the above noted Writ Appeal. Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 30-Jul-2025 16:47:14 Signature Not Verified 6. It is also made clear that if the Petitioner is so advised, he may prefer a CONTC after disposal of the said Writ Appeal. 7. This CONTC is, accordingly, disposed of being dropped. (Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Judge Ayaskanta Designation: Personal Assistant