Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2289 (GAU)

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. v. KHAGEN BORO AND ANR

I.A.(Civil)/256/2025 · 2026-02-19

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010277652024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/256/2025 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, REP. BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, BHANGAGARH, GUWAHATI-05, DIST. KAMRUP(M), ASSAM. VERSUS KHAGEN BORO AND ANR H/O. LT. DULUMONI BORO, R/O. VILL.- MURKATA (AMPUR), P/S. KHETRI, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN-782403. 2:SAYED MAHMUD S/O. SAYED WAZED ALI R/O. VILL.- SARUMOTORIA H/NO. 19 WARD NO. 51 P/S. DISPUR DIST. KAMRUP(M) ASSAM PIN-781005 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS L SHARMA, Advocate for the Respondent : B SARMA (R-1), MR. M TALUKDAR(R-1) BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER 20.02.2026 Page No.# 2/2 Learned counsel Ms. L. Sharma is present for the Insurance Company/applicant and learned counsel Mr. M. Talukdar is present for respondent No. 1/claimant. It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that the delay was not intentional. Learned counsel for the claimant has no objection if the delay is condoned. Considering the submission at the Bar, the delay is condoned. Registry to register the connected MAC appeal. In terms of the above observation, this I.A. stands disposed of. The name of learned counsel Mr. M. Talukdar to be reflected in the cause-list as learned counsel representing the appellant. JUDGE Comparing Assistant