Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22889 (RAJ)

MUKESH KUMAR @ LUCKY @ LAKY0 SON OF RAMAVATAR @ DHARAMPAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8358/2025 · 2025-09-01

Praveer Bhatnagar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:34938] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.8358/2025 1. Mukesh Kumar @ Lucky @ Lakyo Son of Ramavatar @ Dharampal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Sundarpura, Police Station Kotputli, District Kotputli-Bahrod (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Kotputli). 2. Roki @ Adesh Son Of Ramawatar @ Dharampal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Sundarpura, Police Station Kotputli, District Kotputli-Bahrod (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Kotputli). 3. Manoj Kumar Alias Rajesh Alias Gulyo Son Of Phoolchand Alias Ganpat, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Govindpura Dhabai, Police Station Shahpura, District Jaipur Rural. (At Present Confined In Sub-Jail, Kotputli) ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shantnu Bansal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 01/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.107/2025, registered at Police Station Manoharpur, District Jaipur Rural, for the offence(s) under Section 307 of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the accused- petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is [2025:RJ-JP:34938] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8358/2025] contended that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 24.05.2025, the charge-sheet has already been submitted against the accused-petitioners and the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application and contended that the accused-petitioners are a habitual offenders and against them several cases are registered for various offences, therefore, considering the gravity and nature of offence, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and looking to the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioners are in custody since 24.05.2025, charge-sheet has already been submitted and the trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused petitioners namely; 1. Mukesh Kumar @ Lucky @ Lakyo Son of Ramavatar @ Dharampal, 2. Roki @ Adesh Son Of Ramawatar @ Dharampal and 3. Manoj Kumar Alias Rajesh Alias Gulyo Son Of Phoolchand Alias Ganpat, in connection with FIR No.107/2025, registered at Police Station Manoharpur, District Jaipur Rural, shall be enlarged on bail provided each of [2025:RJ-JP:34938] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8358/2025] them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioners are also directed to mark their presence on 25th of every month before the concerned Police Station till conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioners and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioners on the same day to the concerned trial Court every month without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused- petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioners are also directed to submit their present address along with their mobile number to the concerned S.H.O. and the concerned S.H.O. shall verify the said addresses and the mobile numbers. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-85