IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 13056/2025 Decided on: 13.08.2025 Rahul …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. M.A. Safee, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has filed a representation on 22.07.2025 (Annexure P-4) to the respondents/competent authority for the redressal of his grievances raised in this writ petition. Petitioner’s grievance is that the representation preferred by him to the respondents for redressal of his grievances in light of settled legal position has not been adjudicated till date. Learned counsel further submitted that the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 petitioner would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 13th August, 2025(rohit)