2025:JHHC:20192 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 878 of 2024 ----- Md. Jamil Ansari @ Sadam @ Jamil Ansary, S/o Md. Khalil Ansari, R/o Kaki Bazar, P.O.-Gobra, P.S.-Santhaldih, Dist.-Purulia, West Bengal, at present R/o Room No. 9, under House No. 5, 17/314 D-17 Raja Bazar, P.O. & P.S.-Cant, Dist.-Varanasi (U.P.) … …. Petitioner Versus 1. Saba Perween, W/o Md. Jamil Ansari @ Sadam, D/o Md. Sakil 2. Laiba Firdosh, D/o Md. Jamil Ansari @ Sadam (minor aged about 3.5 years, represented through her mother O.P. No.1 herein), both at present R/o Muzahid Nagar, P.O. & P.S.-Hindpiri, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand … …. Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, A.P.P. For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Anil Kr. Sinha, Advocate ----- Oral Order 05 / Dated : 23.07.2025 1. The instant revision petition has been preferred against the judgment dated 31.05.2024 passed in Original Maintenance Case No. 26 of 2021, whereby and whereunder, learned Additional Principal Judge, Additional Family Court-1, Ranchi has directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 5,000/- per month in favour of O.P. No.1 and Rs. 2,000/- per month in favour of O.P. No.2, his minor child under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the maintenance, awarded, is excessive as the petitioner is working as a barber in the shop of his brother-in-law from where he is earning Rs.10,000/- as monthly income. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of O.P. No.2 that neither any show cause was filed by the petitioner nor any evidence was led on his behalf to rebut the evidence that the petitioner was having a monthly income of Rs.1.5 Lakh per month from his business of Beauty Parlor. It has also come in the evidence that the petitioner had Beauty Parlor shop at two places i.e. Banaras and Ranchi. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both sides, I do not find any infirmity in the impugned order. This revision petition stands dismissed. Pending I.A., if any, stands disposed of. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) AKT/Satayendra