Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22876 (CHH)

TEJ KUMAR GABEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2939/2024 · 2025-01-07

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:1022 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2939 of 2024 1 - Tej Kumar Gabel S/o Ram Singh Gabel Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Karrapali, Tahsil Adbhar, District Sakti (C.G.) Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Sakti, District Sakti (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer-Cum-Land Acquisition Officer Malkharoda, District Sakti (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar Malkharoda, District Sakti (C.G.) 5 - Tahsildar Adbhar, District Sakti (C.G.) 6 - Project Manager Asian Development Bank (Adb) Project, Chhattisgarh Road Development Project, Public Works Department, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 7 - Cheif Engineer Public Works Department, Zone Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 8 - Project Director Asian Development Bank (Adb) Project, Chhattisgarh Road Development Project, Public Works Department, Sirpur Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) Respondent(s) RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2025.01.08 17:57:32 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sushobhit Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 07/01/2025 1. By the present Writ Petition, the petitioner is seeking directions towards the respondents to grant proper compensation in respect of land bearing Khasra No.337 & 338 in terms of the policy of Chhattisgarh Apsi Sahmati Se Bhumi Kray Niti, 2016. 2. By referring to the rejoinder submitted by the counsel for the petitioner, he would submit that after filing of the present writ petition, the Respondent/State Authority has submitted a proposal dated 21/11/2024, which clearly shows that the land of the petitioner has been acquired for the construction of the road. He would submit that the petitioner is ready to accept the proposal dated 21/11/2024 passed by the Respondents’ Authorities. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that as the proposal has been submitted by the respondents’ authorities, the compensation shall be paid to the petitioner in terms of the proposal dated 21/11/2024. 4. I have heard counsel for the parties and perused the documents annexed with the petition. 5. Looking to the submissions made by both the parties and the proposal dated 21/11/2024 placed along with rejoinder, it is 3 apparent that payment of compensation is to be made to the petitioner. Therefore, it is directed that the Respondent No.2/Collector shall proceed in the matter and will ensure payment of the compensation to the petitioner in terms of the Proposal dated 21/11/2024 within a period of 4 months from today. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed off. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul