[2025:RJ-JP:30539] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8265/2025 Mankesh S/o Budhiprakash, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Hingoni, Police Station Kundera, District Sawai Madhopur ( At Present Ac- cused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Sawai Madhopur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Balaut For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Tarun Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.126/2025 registered at Police Station Kundera, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 351(3) & 333 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR which has been registered on the basis of parcha bayan. Counsel submits that it appears from the FIR that entire allegation is against the co-accused Kuldeep Singh who caused injury to the injured. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody [2025:RJ-JP:30539] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8265/2025] since 19.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. However, they fairly conceded the fact that petitioner is not named in the FIR and allegations are appearing against the co-accused Kuldeep Singh and some unknown persons in the FIR. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially the fact that petitioner is not named in the FIR; there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Mankesh S/o Budhiprakash shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:30539] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8265/2025] 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /379