- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23948 WP No. 11131 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.11131 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. HOSALAIAH S/O LATE DODDA SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT KITHAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, GULURU HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK. TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARSHA KUMAR GOWDA H R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA STATE OF KARNATAKA, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR-572101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TUMKUR SUB-DIVISION, TUMKUR-572101. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23948 WP No. 11131 of 2025 4. THE TAHASILDAR, TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101. 5. SMT. GANGAMMA, W/O LATE GANGARJUNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, 6. PUTTAMALLAIAH, S/O BHEEMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, 7. MALLAIAH, S/O BHEEMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 8. MAHALAKSHMAMMA, W/O LATE CHIKKAGANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.5 TO 8 ARE R/AT SANKAPURA VILLAGE, GULUR HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101. 9. SRI. HARISH, S/O LATE DODDA SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT KITHAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, GULURU HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABURAO, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 27.11.2024 PASSED BY THE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23948 WP No. 11131 of 2025 RESPONDENT NO.2 IN PROCEEDINGS R.P. NO. 38/2023 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE- K; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent-State. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing order dated 27.11.2024 in RP.No.38 of 2023, (Annexure-K) and order dated 15.12.2022 in RRT (A) CR.524/2022 (Annexure-J) passed by the respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein. 4. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties, the impugned mutation has been made by the respondent-authorities as per the registered Sale - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23948 WP No. 11131 of 2025 Deed produced by the private respondents herein. In that view of the matter, I do not find any merit in the writ petition as the respondent-authorities have changed the mutation as per Section 128 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. Needless to say that, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the same, the petitioner is directed to approach the civil court and to establish his right in respect of subject land. Therefore, no interference is called for in the impugned order dated 27.11.2024 in RP.No.38 of 2023, (Annexure-K) and order dated 15.12.2022 in RRT (A) CR.524/2022 (Annexure-J) passed by the respondent Nos.2 and 3. Accordingly, the writ petition dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25