Sh. P.C. Lalthlamuana v. Sh. Lalramhmachhuana and 7 Ors.
I.A.(Civil)/99/2025 · 2025-09-03
Marli Vankung
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22872 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22872 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC030004032025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/99/2025 Sh. P.C. Lalthlamuana S/o Keiaia (L) R/o Bethlehem Vengthlang Aizawl VERSUS Sh. Lalramhmachhuana and 7 Ors. S/o R. Khawvelthanga R/o Keifang Venghlui Mizoram
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Zoramchhana Advocate for the Respondent : Mr Lalfakawma for R1
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG
ORDER Date : 04-09-2025 Heard Mr. Zoramchhana, learned counsel for the applicant along with Mr. T. Lalzekima, learned counsel for respondent No. 1, Mr. Zodinpuia Hnamte,
learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2, 3, 5 & 6, Mr. K. Vanlalneihpuia, learned counsel for respondent No. 4 and Ms. Lalnunhlui, learned Government Advocate for respondent Nos. 7 & 8.
Page No.# 2/2 The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the respondent No. 5 in the connected FAO No. 3/2025 had died on 18.11.2010 and he is survived by his son Ngaihkhama Ralte. The learned counsel submits that on the demise of respondent No. 5 i.e., R. Lalliana, he may be allowed to be substituted by his son Ngaihkhama Ralte in the connected FAO No. 3/2025. The learned counsels for the respondents have not objected to the substitution of the deceased R. Lalliana by his son Ngaihkhama Ralte. Accordingly, on considering the nature of the application made, this court finds it appropriate to allow the instant IA by allowing the substitution of Mr. R. Lalliana by his son, Ngaihkhama Ralte in the connected FAO No. 3/2025. Accordingly, I.A.(Civil) No. 99/2025 stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant