Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 228698 (MAD)

P. POORNIMA v. K. VIKRAM

CMA/3398/2025 · 2025-11-13

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.M.A.No.3398 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 13.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR C.M.A.No.3398 of 2025 & C.M.P.No.28138 of 2025 Dr.P.Poornima ... Appellant(s) Vs. Mr.K.Vikram ... Respondent(s) Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act r/w Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.6 of 2024 in H.M.O.P.No.1463 of 2020 dated 01.07.2025 by the III Additional Family Court, Chennai. For Appellant(s) : Mr.Prakash, Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Karthikeyani https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.3398 of 2025 J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.) The appeal filed against the dismissal of the divorce petition filed by the wife stands dismissed, since the reasons stated by the appellant to restore her petition, which was dismissed for default, are not satisfactory either to the Court below or to this Court. 2. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant seeks liberty to file a fresh petition, if any new ground has arisen subsequent to the dismissal of the earlier divorce petition. It is always open to the appellant to file a fresh petition on a new cause of action. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. (Dr.G.J.,J.) (M.S.K.,J.) 13.11.2025 skr Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes / No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.3398 of 2025 To The III Additional Family Court, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.3398 of 2025 DR.G. JAYACHANDRAN , J. and MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR , J. skr C.M.A.No.3398 of 2025 13.11.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis