Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22866 (GAU)

Sh. Chawngkhuma (L) S/b. Hmangaihsangzuali v. Union of India, R/b Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highway and 3 Ors.

WP(C)/75/2025 · 2025-07-14

Marli Vankung

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC030003972025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/75/2025 Sh. Chawngkhuma (L) S/b. Hmangaihsangzuali S/o Tuidapa (L) R/o Chhiahtlang, Serchhip District, Mizoram VERSUS Union of India, R/b Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highway and 3 Ors. Govt. of India, Transport Bhawan, 1, Parliament Street, New Delhi 2:National Highway and Infrastructure Development Corporation LTD. (NHIDCL) R/b its Managing Director (P) 3rd Floor PTI Building 4 Parliament Street New Delhi 3:The General Manager (Project) NHIDCL PMU-Seling Thingsulthliah Aizawl District Mizoram 4:The Deputy Commissioner and CALA NH-54 Widening and Upgradation Project Serchhip District Mizora Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Lalchhanliana Khiangte Advocate for the Respondent : Ms Zairemsangpuii, CGC for R 1 Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER Date : 15.07.2025 Heard Mr. Lalchhanliana Khiangte, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that since no interim order was passed in the said instant writ petition, the writ petition has become infructuous, since the house of the petitioner has been demolished. In view of the above, on finding that the instant writ petition has become infructuous, the writ petition stands disposed of. The presence of Mr. Samuel Vanlalhriata Chhangte, learned Addl. Advocate General for respondent Nos. 2 & 3, Ms. Zairemsangpuii, learned CGC for respondent No. 1 and Mr. Ram Murmu, learned counsel for respondent No. 4 are noted. JUDGE Comparing Assistant