Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010206722025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No.: I.A.(Civil)/3021/2025 M/S SUMOTECH INNOVATION PVT. LTD. A PRIVATE LTD. COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMAPNIES ACT 1956 HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 602 WING B DLH METRO VIEW PLOT 195 PT J.P ROAD OPPOSITE SHANKAR NAGAR ANDHERI (WEST) P.O.- MUMBAI MAHARASHTRA-400058 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI GANESH SWAMY S/O LATE ANGU SWAMI VERSUS APRAAVA ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED AND 3 ORS. A PRIVATE LTD. COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 7TH FLOOR FULCRUM SAHAR ROAD ANDHERI (EAST) MUMBAI-400099 MAHARASHTRA 2:HI-PRINT METERING SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED A PRIVATE LTD. COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SPL-3 RIICO INDUSTRIAL AREA TONK ROAD SITAPUR JAIPUR-302022 Page No.# 2/3 RAJASTHAN 3:GENUS POWER INFRASTRUCTRES LIMITED SPL-3 RIICO INDUSTRIAL AREA TONK ROAD SITAPUR JAIPUR-302022 RAJASTHAN 4:ADANI TRANSMISSION LIMITED HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SHANTIGRAM NEAR VAISHNO DEVI CIRCLE S G HIGHWAY KHODIYAR AHMEDABAD AHMEDABAD GUJARAT PIN-382431 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. B. J. Mukherjee, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. D. J. Das, Advocate Mr. B. D. Deka, Advocate BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 17.02.2026 Heard Mr. B. J. Mukherjee, the learned counsel for the applicant. Mr. D. J. Das, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.1, 2 & 3 and Mr. B. D. Deka, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No.4. 2. The present application has been filed by the Page No.# 3/3 petitioner/plaintiff seeking a temporary injunction restraining the opposite parties, their men, agents, assigns etc. from infringing and violating the Patent bearing No.208216 and there is unauthorized use of the same without the consent of the petitioner. 3. Mr. B .J. Mukherjee, the learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff submitted that the Patent bearing No.208216 has expired. 4. Taking into account the above, the question of granting an injunction in the present proceedings does not arise. 5. With the above, the instant I.A. stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant