Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22858 (KAR)

M/S ROBO SILICON LIMITED v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

WP/33293/2019 · 2025-01-24

Lalitha Kanneganti

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3312 WP No. 33293 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 33293 OF 2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: M/S. ROBO SILICON LIMITED, A REGISTERED COMPANY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: SRI. DURGA TOWERS, 4TH FLOOR, NO. 402, ROAD NO. 10, BANJARA HILLS, HYDERABAD - 500 034. HAVING ITS FACTORY AT SY. NO. 196/1, URGAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 109. REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER - LEGAL, SRI. K V PAVAN KUMAR, AGE 52 YEARS, S/O. K. RANGA RAO. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.N. UMESH, AVOCATE FOR SRI. NARASIMHA PRASAD S.D, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE POLICE BHAVAN, B.M. ROAD, RAMANAGARA - 571 511. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BIDADI POLICE STATION, BIDADI, KARNATAKA - 562 109. Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3312 WP No. 33293 of 2019 3. SRI. KENDAPPA HARISH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O. SRI. KENDAPPA, RA/T PUTTIRAMANA DODI, URAGAHALLI POST, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT - 562 109. 4. SRI. KOOTAGAL HANUMAIAH KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O. HANUMAIAH, R/AT KOOTAGAL POST, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT - 562 109. 5. SRI. SHIVALINGAIAH HARISH P.S, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, S/O. LATE. SHIVALINGAIAH, NO. 34, PUTTIRAMANNANADODDI, URAGAHALLI, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT - 562 109. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BASAVARAJ GOGOCHI, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. B.C. AVINASH, ADVOCATE FOR R5; R3 AND R4 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF TE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 AND 2 TO IMPLEMENT THE INTERIM ORDER GRANTED IN SAID O.S.NO.162/2019 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE TRAIL COURT, ON INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1 AND 2 BOTH FILED UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE 1 AND 2 VIDE ANNEXURE-S WHEREBY THE RESPONDENTS HEREIN WERE RESTRAINED BY WAY OF TEMPORARY INJUNCTION FROM INTERFERING WITH THE PEACEFUL FUNCTIONING OF THE PETITIONER FACTORY OVER THE SUIT SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND FROM OBSTRUCTING THE - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3312 WP No. 33293 of 2019 INGRESS AND EGRESS OF THE LORRIES CARRYING AGGREFATES IN AND OUT OF THE PETITIONER'S FACTORY, WHICH FACT WAS COMMUNICATED TO THE R-1 AND 2 VIDE REPRESENTATION DATED 11.7.19 MADE BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN [VIDE ANNEXURE-A HEREIN] AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER It is submitted that the main suit i.e., O.S.No.162/2019 is decreed. In view of the same, nothing survives for consideration in this Writ Petition. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. All IAs., in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE KA CT: BHK