[2025:RJ-JP:30429] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8535/2025 Yashpal Das S/o (Chela) Ramdayal Das, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Dayal Colony, Opposite Khadi Bhandar Bassi, District Jaipur (East) Present Quarter No. 02, Panchayat Samiti Premises, Chaksu, Jaipur (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Liyakat Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.15/2020 registered at Police Station Bassi (Jaipur City(East)), District Jaipur City (East) (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that other co-accused persons namely- Surajmal, Hempal & Dinesh Kumar have already been granted benefit of anticipatory bail by the learned trial Court. Counsel submits that bail cancellation application was also filed by the complainant against the co- accused Surajmal however, vide order dated 15.02.2022, said [2025:RJ-JP:30429] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8535/2025] application became infructuous as parties entered into compromise. It is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the fact that co- accused Surajmal, Hempal & Dinesh Kumar have been granted benefit of anticipatory bail by the learned trial Court, as also the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Yashpal Das S/o (Chela) Ramdayal shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any [2025:RJ-JP:30429] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8535/2025] court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /194