Page No.# 1/5 GAHC030002952025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/78/2025 Smt. Rabea Begum Choudhury and 4 Ors. W/o Late FU Choudhury, R/o Post Badarpur Ghat, PS-Bahdarpur, District-Karimganj, PIN-788808, Assam 2: Sh. Burhan Uddin Choudhury 3: Sh. Mohi Uddin Choudhury 4: Sh. Jashim Uddin Choudhury 5: Sh. Naim Uddin Choudhur VERSUS State of Mizoram and 5 Ors R/b Chief Secretary to the govt. of Mizoram, Aizawl 2:Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram 3:Principal Chief Conservator of Forest 4:Divisional Forest Officer 5:Range Officer 6:Member Secretar Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Victor L Ralte Page No.# 2/5 Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram for R 1-5 Linked Case : WP(C)/141/2023 Smti. Rabea Begum Choudhury and 4 Ors. W/o Late F.U. Choudhury Resident of Post Badarpur Ghat P.S - Badarpur District - Karimganj PIN - 788808 Assam 2: Burhan Uddin Choudhury R/o Post Badarpur Ghat P.S/ - Badarpur District - Karimganj PIN - 788808 Assam 3: Mohi Uddin Choudhury R/o Post Badarpur Ghat P.S/ - Badarpur District - Karimganj PIN - 788808 Assam 4: Jashim Uddin Choudhury R/o Post Badarpur Ghat P.S/ - Badarpur District - Karimganj PIN - 788808 Assam 5: Naim Uddin Choudhury R/o Post Badarpur Ghat P.S/ - Badarpur District - Karimganj PIN - 788808 Assam VERSUS State of Mizoram and 5 Ors. R/b The Chief Secretary to the Government of Mizoram Aizawl 2:The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Page No.# 3/5 Environment and Forests Department Aizawl Mizoram 3:The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest Mizoram Aizawl 4:The Divisional Forest Officer Kolasib Forest Division Kolasib 5:The Range Officer Bairabi Forest Ranger Mizoram 6:The Member Secretary High Powered Committee for North-Eastern Region Room No. 106 Paryavaran Bhawan Lodhi Road New Delhi 110003 Advocate for the Petitioner : B. Pathak Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA Mizoram for R1 to R5 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER Date : 14-07-2025 Ms. B. Lalramhnemi, learned counsel for the applicant is present along with Mrs. Mary L. Khiangte, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents. This is an application for making a correction of the typographical errors found in the connected WP(C) No. 141/2023. Page No.# 4/5 The learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the connected WP(C) No. 141/2023, there was some inadvertent typographical error, wherein the impugned order dated 30.04.2002 enclosed as Annexure 16 had been inadvertently mentioned as 30.04.2022. She therefore prays that the correction may be made in the following lines:- (a) Cause title at page no. 2, (b) 6th line of Para 28 and 2nd line of sub-para 28, (c) 1st line Para 32, (d) 1st line Para 33, (e) 2nd line Para 34, (f) 9th line of prayer portion in Page 23. The learned counsel for the applicant also mentioned that the order dated 07.04.1999 was also inadvertently written as 07.04.199. She further submits that the Annexure-3 of the writ petition i.e. page 32 is in the Mizo vernacular and that she may be allowed to enclose the English translated version. Considering the nature of the corrections, which are required to be made in the connected WP(C) No. 141/2023, this court finds that the corrections are purely due to typographical errors and therefore, find it fit to allow the applicant to make the necessary corrections in the connected WP(C) No. 141/2023. Accordingly, the instant I.A.(Civil) No. 78/2025 stands allowed and disposed of. The learned counsel to take necessary steps in making the corrections and Page No.# 5/5 the corrected copy is to be duly furnished to the learned counsels for the respondents. List the connected WP(C) No. 141/2023 after 2 (two) weeks. JUDGE Comparing Assistant