Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22855 (JHR)

YOGESH SINGH ALIAS SHASHI KANT SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4841/2025 · 2025-08-27

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:25564 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4841 of 2025 ----------- Yogesh Singh @ Shashi Kant Singh aged about 49 years son of late Lalan Prasad Singh resident of DT 2974 Near Jagganath Near College HEC Colony Dhurwa PS and PS Dhurwa Dist.Ranchi, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand ............. Opposite Party --------------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------------ For the Petitioner :- Ms. Tejaswi, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Ruby Pandey, Advocate ------------ 4/27.08.2025 Heard learned counsels for petitioner and for State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dhurwa PS Case No.42 of 2025, for offence registered under section 109, 3(5) BNS and 27 of Arms Act, pending in court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has gone to attend marriage ceremony on request of one Anshu Singh on 10.2.2025 whereas victim has joined marriage party at 8.30 p.m in the quarter at Dhurwa and informant has participated at about 9 p.m in the said marriage ceremony and thereafter petitioner has returned back. She submits that it has been alleged that about 12 O’ Clock one fire was shot and pursuant that injury was received by the brother of the informant. She submits that four witnesses have been examined by police namely Anshu Kumar, Sanjay Kumar, Satyam Singh and Krishna Kumar on 11.2.2025 and they have stated that they have not seen the person. She further submits that one another witness has stated that he saw only Monu @ Ritesh Kumar who has shot fire. She further submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 32. In this background she submits that petitioner may kindly be allowed anticipatory bail. 4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that name of the petitioner has also been taken by witness Pranay Kumar. 5. In view of above it transpires that notice under section 35(3) of BNS, 2023 has been complied by the petitioner and in that view of the matter, the petitioner above named is directed to surrender before learned court within two weeks from today and learned court shall release petitioner, above named, on such terms and conditions as well as sureties as learned court may deem fit and proper. 6. This petition is disposed of. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) SI/