Page No.# 1/4 GAHC030003662025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/64/2025 Mr B. Lalengkima S/o Lianchhawna R/o Dinthar, Khawzawl District, Mizoram VERSUS The State of Mizoram.R/b the Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram and 9 Ors. Aizawl, Mizoram 2:The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Land Revenue and Settlement Departmen/Commissioner 3:The Deputy Commissioner 4:The Competent Authority for Land Acquisition (CALA) 5:The Unit of Inida R/b the Secretary to the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways 6:The National Highway and Infrastruction Development Corporation Limited (NHIDCL) 7:The General Manager (LA and Admin) 8:The Executive Engineer (P) NHIDCL Page No.# 2/4 9:The Executive Director (TECH) NHIDCL Ministry of Road Transport and Highways 10:The Special Secretary and Commissioner of Rehabilitation and Resettlemen Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Johny L Tochhawng Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram FOR R1-3 & 10 BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER 16.09.2025 Mr. Johny L Tochhawng, learned counsel for the petitioner is present along with Ms. Lalnunhlui, learned Govt. Advocate for the State respondent Nos. 1 – 3 and Mr. Samuel Vanlalhriata Chhangte, learned Standing Counsel for NHIDCL/respondent Nos. 5 - 9. The learned counsels submit that the parties have come to an amicable settlement through mediation on 12.09.2025, in mediation case No. 19 of 2025, and therefore, the instant writ petition can be disposed of. 2. On hearing the submissions made by the learned counsels for the parties this Court has perused the terms of agreement reached by the Page No.# 3/4 parties in mediation Case No. 19 of 2025 dated 12.09.2025. 3. It is seen that the parties come to an amicable settlement in the following terms. “After discussion of the matter, the parties come to a settlement as under:- (I) Re – verification of the land of the petitioner shall be done within two weeks from issuance of order by the Hon’ble Court. Re – verification of the land shall be done by CALA in presence of NHIDCL representative and the land owner or his representative. (ii) By rely – ing on the re – verification of the land, CALA authority shall process additional assessment for further processing additional sanction to be made by the NHIDCL for full and actual payment to the land owner / petitioner along with the accrued interests. (iii) During the period of conducting re – verification, the NHIDCL authority shall be at liberty to verify whether any amount of Compensation is credited in the bank account of Mr. T.B.C. Page No.# 4/4 Lalnuntluanga or not.” 4. On perusal of the terms of agreement reached by the parties, this Court finds the terms of agreement acceptable and in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, this Court find it fit to disposed of the instant writ petition in terms of the agreement reached by the parties as highlighted above. 6. WP(C) No. 64 of 2025 thus stands disposed of as above. JUDGE Comparing Assistant