Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22853 (JHR)

ROJI KHATUN ALIAS BIBI ROJI PRAWEEN ALIAS BIBI ROZY PRAVIN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4643/2025 · 2025-09-26

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 A.B.A. No. 4643 of 2025 2025:JHHC:30652 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4643 of 2025 ---- 1.Roji Khatun @ Bibi Roji Parween @ Bibi Rozy Pravin aged about 34 years wife of Md. Hajrat Ali 2.Anguri Khatun @ Anguri aged about 55 years wife of Mahmood Ali 3.Mahmood Ali @ Mahmud Ali, aged about 54 years, son of Rafiq Ali, All resident of Ghat Gamhariya, PO and PS Godda, Dist. Godda .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Jasvinder Mazumdar, Advocate Mr. Nishant Kr Roy, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Informant :- Md. Praveen Shankar Prasad, Advocate ---- 3/26.09.2025 Heard learned counsels for petitioner and for State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mahagama PS Case no.98 of 2025, for offence registered under section 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 109, 190, 191(2), 191(3) and 76 of BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Godda. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that so far as the assault upon the informant is concerned, that allegation is there against one Hazrat Ali. She submits that so far as petitioner nos.1 and 2 are concerned, they are ladies of the family and against the petitioner no.3 one criminal antecedent is there. 4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that injury is also received. 5. Learned counsel for the informant submits that occurrence took place due to drainage of the water. 2 A.B.A. No. 4643 of 2025 6. Considering that so far as petitioner nos.1 and 2 are concerned, they are ladies of the family and against them there is no serious allegation as such, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner nos.1 and 2 and accordingly, petitioner nos.1 and 2, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before learned court within three weeks from today, and in event of their surrender/arrest, petitioner nos.1 and 2, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of like amount each, to satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Godda, in connection with Mahagama PS Case no.98 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. 7. So far as the petitioner no.3 is concerned, there are criminal antecedents and this is third one, as such, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner no.3. Hence, prayer for anticipatory bail in respect of petitioner no.3 is, hereby, rejected. 8. This petition is allowed in respect of petitioners nos.1 and 2, and this petition is dismissed with respect to petitioner no.3. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 26th Sept., 2025 SI/