[2025:RJ-JP:30520] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8247/2025 Kuldeep Singh Son Of Haricharan, Aged About 34 Years, Resi- dent Of House No. 02, Kotra Dhahar, Police Station Sadar, Hin- daun City, District Karauli (Raj.) ( At Present Confined At Central Jail Ajmer) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishwas Shukla For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.65/2025 registered at Police Station Clock Tower, District Ajmer for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. He submits that neither any amount has been transferred in the bank account of the petitioner nor there is allegation against him of taking any cash payment. It is contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is a Government Servant and he is in custody since his date of arrest and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:30520] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8247/2025] 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially considering the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate, as also considering the fact that neither any amount has been transferred in the bank account of the petitioner nor there is allegation against him of taking any cash payment, there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Kuldeep Singh Son Of Haricharan shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J GAUTAM JAIN /177