Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22849 (CHH)

JAYA RAM WARE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3006/2024 · 2025-01-07

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:1022 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3006 of 2024 1 - Jaya Ram Ware Son Of Bhogan Ware Aged About 48 Years Resident Of Village Karrapali, Tahsil Adbhar, District - Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chhedi Lal Ware Son Of Bhogdan Ware Aged About 62 Years Resident Of Village Karrapali, Tahsil Adbhar, District - Sakti, Chhattisgarh. Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector Sakti, District - Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sub Divisional Officer-Cum-Land Acquisition Officer Malkharoda, District - Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Tahsildar Malkharoda, District - Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Tahsildar Adbhar, District - Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Project Manager Asian Development Bank (Adb) Project, Chhattisgarh Road Development, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Chief Engineer Public Works Department, Zone - Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2025.01.08 17:57:27 +0530 2 8 - Project Director Asian Development Bank (Adb) Project, Chhattisgarh Road Development, Sirpur, Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sushobhit Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 07/01/2025 1. By the present Writ Petition, the petitioner is seeking directions towards the respondents to grant proper compensation in respect of land bearing Khasra No. 130/1 (area 144 sq. meter) in terms of the policy of Chhattisgarh Apsi Sahmati Se Bhumi Kray Niti, 2016. 2. By referring to the covering memo submitted by the counsel for the petitioner, he would submit that after filing of the present writ petition, the Respondent/State Authority has submitted a proposal dated 20/12/2024, which clearly shows that the land of the petitioner has been acquired for the construction of the road. He would submit that the petitioner is ready to accept the proposal dated 20/12/2024 passed by the Respondents’ Authorities. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that as the proposal has been submitted by the respondents’ authorities, the compensation shall be paid to the petitioner in terms of the proposal dated 20/12/2024. 4. I have heard counsel for the parties and perused the documents 3 annexed with the petition. 5. Looking to the submissions made by both the parties and the proposal dated 20/12/2024 placed along with covering memo, it is apparent that payment of compensation is to be made to the petitioner. Therefore, it is directed that the Respondent No.2/Collector shall proceed in the matter and will ensure payment of the compensation to the petitioner in terms of the Proposal dated 20/12/2024 within a period of 4 months from today. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed off. Sd/- Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul