THE SUPDT.OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM & 2 OTHERS v. SRI M.NARASIMHA RAO, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
WP/19657/2006 · 2025-09-07
Ninala Jayasurya, Tuhin Kumar Gedela
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22845 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22845 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010322492006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION N Between:
1. The Superintendent of Police, Krishna District, Machilipatnam, and others. AND Sri M.Narasimha Rao, S/ Ghantasala P.S., Ghantasala Mandal, Krishna District. Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondent
The Court made the following
Heard Mr.G.Raju, learned Government Pleader for Services None entered appearance on behalf of the respondent. 2. The writ petition was filed challenging the order of the learned A.P. Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad dated 08.6.2006 in O.A. 2002 wherein the Proceedings dated 17.11.2000 of the Superintendent of Police, Krishna District holding the respondent guilty of misconduct and imposing punishment of stoppage of annual grade increments for a period of two years was set aside. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION No.19657 OF 2006 Superintendent of Police, Krishna District, Machilipatnam, ...Petitioner Sri M.Narasimha Rao, S/o.M.Venkateswara Rao, Head Constable 863, Ghantasala P.S., Ghantasala Mandal, Krishna District. ...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioners : G.P. for Services–I Counsel for the Respondent : -----
The Court made the following ORDER: (per Hon’ble NJS,J) Heard Mr.G.Raju, learned Government Pleader for Services None entered appearance on behalf of the respondent. The writ petition was filed challenging the order of the learned A.P. Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad dated 08.6.2006 in O.A. No.1730 of 2002 wherein the Proceedings dated 17.11.2000 of the Superintendent of Police, Krishna District holding the respondent guilty of misconduct and imposing punishment of stoppage of annual grade increments for a period of two years was set aside. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Superintendent of Police, Krishna District, Machilipatnam, ...Petitioners o.M.Venkateswara Rao, Head Constable 863, ...Respondent Heard Mr.G.Raju, learned Government Pleader for Services–I. The writ petition was filed challenging the order of the learned A.P. No.1730 of 2002 wherein the Proceedings dated 17.11.2000 of the Superintendent of Police, Krishna District holding the respondent guilty of misconduct and imposing punishment of stoppage of annual grade increments for a
2 WP_19657_2006
3.
The said order of the learned Tribunal was suspended vide orders dated 27.9.2006 in I.A. No.1 of 2006 (W.P.M.P. No.24809 of 2006). 4. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, states that in view of the Proceedings dated 17.11.2000, the respondent filed appeal before the D.I.G. of Police, Eluru Range, Eluru, and the same was rejected vide Proceedings in C.No.6/Appeal/2001, dated 23.3.2001. Subsequently, the revision petition was also dismissed. Be that as it may. He submits that on 03.6.2011, the respondent was promoted as Sub- Inspector of Police and on 31.5.2018 he retired from the service on attaining the age of superannuation. 5. In view of the same, nothing survives for adjudication and the writ petition is, therefore, closed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J
_____________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA,J September 08, 2025 vasu