APHC010321952014 tN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT honourable SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1024 HF on^iA Revision filed under Section 397 and order of the Family FCOP.No. 1030/2013 dated 21-11-2013 Between: 401 of CrPC, aggrieved by the IA.No.656/2013 in court, Viskhapatnam in Cheekati Rambabu, S/o.Sreenivasa Working as Electrician, Grade Trust, Residing at C/o. Vinaynagar, VUDA Colony, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam. . Rao, Hindu, aged about 44 years, CME Department, Visakhapatnam Port Seshu Babu, HIG-I, B-1, S-1 A.S.Residency ...PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT AND 1. Cheekati Sunitha, W/o.Rambabu, [ No.5, B.R.Complex, D.No.15-15-121 Visakhapatnam. Hindu, aged about 36 years, R/o.Flat J, Mahranipeta, Near Supreme Hotels 2. Cheekati Venkata Satya Sai Anila, D/o.Rambabu, Hindu, aged about 14 5, B.R.Complex, D.No.15-15-121, Visakhapatnam. years Student of 9th Class, R/o.Flat No. Mahranipeta, Near Supreme Hotels V*- 3. Cheekati Jayasree, D/o.Rambabu, Hindu, aged 10 years, studying 5*^ class, R/o.Flat No.5, B.R.Complex, D.No.15-15-121, Mahranipeta, Near Supreme Hotels, Visakhapatnam. (Respondents No.2 & 3 being minors represented By their mother and natural guardian i.e., 1st Petitioner) 4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati ...RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONER lA NO: 2 OF 2014rCRLRCMP 1614 OF 2014 Petition under Section 482 of CrPC, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the order dated 21.11.2013 in IA.No.656/2013 in FCOP.No. 1030/2013 Family Court, Visakhapatnam Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.A.V.RATNAM Counsel for the Respondent No.4: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) Counsel for the Respondent No’s 1 to 3: SRI.J DILEEP KUMAR The Court made the following ORDER : APHC010321952014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] B MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1024/2014 Between: 1.CHEEKATI RAMBABU, S/O.SREENIVASA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, WORKING AS ELECTRICIAN, GRADE [I, CME DEPARTMENT, VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST, RESIDING AT C/O.SESHU BABU, HIG-I, B-1, S-1 A.S.RESIDENCY VINAYNAGAR, VUDA COLONY, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1.CHEEKATI SUNITHA AND 3 OTHERS, W/O.RAMBABU, HINDU AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 2.CHEEKATI VENKATA SATYA SAI ANILA, D/O.RAMBABU, HINDU AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS STUDENT OF 9TH CLASS, 3.CHEEKATI JAYASREE, D/O.RAMBABU, HINDU, AGED 10 YEARS, STUDYING 56 CLASS (RESPONDENTS N0.2 & 3 BEING MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN I.E., ALL ARE R/O.FLAT N0.5, B.R.COMPLEX, MAHRANIPETA, NEAR SUPREME HOTELS, 15 PETITIONER ) D.NO.15-15-121 VISAKHAPATNAM. 4.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 m Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the order of the Family court., Viskhapatnam in IA.No.656/2013 in FCOP NO 1030/2013 dt. 21-11-2013 and pass. lA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 1152 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pieased to condone the deiay of 41 days in fiiing the Revision against the order 21-11- 2013 Visakhapatnam and pass. LA NO: 2 OF 2014rCRLRCMP 1R14 OF 2014 m IA.NO.656/2013 in FCOP.No.1030/2013 Family Court, Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the order dated 21.11.2013 in IA.No.656/2013 in FCOP.No. 1030/2013 Family Court, Visakhapatnam Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.SAVRATNAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2.JDILEEP KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER 1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 401 the Cr.P.C.’) against the Order dated 21.11.2013 passed in I.A.No.656 of 2013 in FCOP No.1030 of 2013 on the file of Family Court, Visakhapatnam (for short the trial Court’). The learned trial Court granting interim maintenance of Rs.3000/- each to the petitioners therein towards maintenance. 2. A perusal of the proceedings of this Court reveals that directions issued to the Secretary of the District Legal were Services Authority, 3 Visakhapatnam, to record the statements of the parties involved. Pursuant to this, the DLSA submitted its report, which indicates that the notice issued to the petitioner was returned as un-served, with an endorsement "no such person at that address." Similarly, the notice addressed to Respondent No.1 was also returned as un-served. As a result, the presence of both the petitioner and Respondent No.1 could not be secured. Despite the best efforts made by this Court to serve notice on the petitioner, service could not be effected. The present revision petition has been filed challenging the order passed in I.A. No. 656 of 2013, whereby interim maintenance of Rs.3,000/- was granted to the petitioners therein. However, the petitioner herein has not shown any interest in prosecuting the revision. 3. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non prosecution. 4. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. SDI- V.DIWAKAR DEPUTY REgiStRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Judge, Family Court, Viskhapatnam, Viskhapatnam District 2. One CC to SRI S.A.V. RATNAM, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI J. DILEEP KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. [OUT] 5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 6. Two CD Copies MV TAC t HIGH COURT DATED:04/08/2025 1 ORDER CRLRC NO. 1024 OF 2014 ss? S' gf 0 2 SEP 2025 Sectioax^ DISMISSING THE CRLRC FOR NON-PROSECUTION