R RANJITH CHAKRAVARTHI v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
WP/4764/2025 · 2025-02-12
G K Ilanthiraiyan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22838 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22838 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.4764 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12.02.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.4764 of 2025 R.Ranjith Chakravarthi ...Petitioner -Vs-
1. The Superintendent of Police, Velur, Namakkal District.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Velur, Namakkal District.
3. The Inspector of Police, Paramthi Police Station, Paramathy, Namakkal District.
... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from in any manner interfering with the affairs of the petitioner's club, viz., AAA Sports and Social Welfare Club Namakkal at Chettair Plot No.95, Keerambur, Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal District, at its members including the facilities provided for playing various games including the game of playing rummy not involving any element of gambling. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vignesh For Respondents : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.4764 of 2025
ORDER This writ petition has been filed for forbearing the respondents from in any manner interfering with the affairs of the petitioner's club, viz., AAA Sports and Social Welfare Club Namakkal at Chettair Plot No.95, Keerambur, Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal District.
2. On instructions, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents submitted that as against the petitioner so far four cases have been registered on the file of the third respondent in Crime Nos.203 of 2023; 40 of 2024; 236 of 2024 & 275 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 9 & 12 of Tamil Nadu Gaming Act, 1930. After registration of the FIR, two cases are ended in conviction and in one case, the respondent police filed final report and in one case the investigation is pending.
3. Considering the above facts and circumstances, the petitioner is being an accused and indulged in the criminal activity repeatedly, he cannot seek such a direction as against the respondents. Therefore, the writ petition itself devoid of merits and liable to be dismissed. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.4764 of 2025
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. 12.02.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order rts To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Velur, Namakkal District.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Velur, Namakkal District.
3. The Inspector of Police, Paramthi Police Station, Paramathy, Namakkal District.
4. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.4764 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, rts W.P.No.4764 of 2025 12.02.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis