Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1511 WP No. 14424 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 14424 OF 2020 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
MR. M.G.VINESH S/O MR. M.C.GANAPATHY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT NITTUR VILLAGE AND POST, BALALEHOBLI, VIRAJPET TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT-571 219. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAN.K.N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOME, VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEDI, BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KODAGU DISTRICT, KODAGU-571 218.
3.
THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GONIKOPPA POLICE STATION, GONIKOPPA-571 213.
KODAGU DISTRICT.
4.
THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIRAJPET SUB-DIVISION, VIRAJPET-571 278.
KODAGU DISTRICT.
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1511 WP No. 14424 of 2020
5.
THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE PONNAMPET POLICE STATION, PONNAMPET-571 216.
KODAGU DISTRICT.
6.
DEVAIAH MAPANGADA POOVAIAH, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O MAPANGADA NANJAPPA POOVIAH, RESIDING AT JAYANTHI ESTATE, NITTUR POST, BALELE, VIRAJPET, KODAGU-571 219. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1 TO 5;
SRI. KIRAN.V.RON., ADVOCATE FOR R6)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Sri.Mohan.K.N., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for respondents 1 to 5 have appeared in person.
2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.05.2020 vide Annexure-X and intervene in the matter and issue an order to respondents 3 to 5 not to register any case against the
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1511 WP No. 14424 of 2020
petitioner and his family on the false complaints where the matter related to civil disputes.
3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care.
4. The petitioner is seeking the relief against respondents 3 to 5 not to register the case against him and his family members. Such a prayer cannot be accorded in the writ petition. I decline to exercise power under Writ jurisdiction. The Writ Petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed.
5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 15