Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 228294 (MAD)

MANIVEL v. Ramasamy (Died) 2. THANGARAJ

CMP(MD)/11765/2025 · 2025-12-15

K Murali Shankar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.M.P.(MD)No.11765, 11766 & 11767 of 2025 in S.A(MD)No.198 of 2015 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATE : 15.12.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR C.M.P.(MD)Nos.11765, 11766 and 11767 of 2025 in S.A(MD)No.198 of 2015 1.Manivel 2.Manikandan 3.Manimakudan : Petitioners (in all petitions) Vs. 1.Ramasamy (died) 2.Thangaraj 3.Rajendran 4.Nagaraj : Respondents (in all petitions) PRAYER in C.M.P(MD)No. 11765 of 2025: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 Limitation Act to condone the delay of 55 days in filing the petition for set aside the abatement caused on the death of the first respondent Ramasamy in SA(MD)No.198 of 2015. PRAYER in C.M.P(MD)No.11766 of 2025 : Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under 22 Rule 9(2) of C.P.C., to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the first respondent Ramasamy in SA(MD)No.198 of 2015. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.(MD)No.11765, 11766 & 11767 of 2025 in S.A(MD)No.198 of 2015 PRAYER in C.M.P(MD)No.11767 of 2025 : Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order 22 Rule 4 of C.P.C., to bring on record the respondents 3 & 4 herein, legal representatives of the deceased first respondent and rank them as respondents 3 and 4 in SA(MD)No.198 of 2015. PRAYER in S.A (MD)No. 198 of 2015 : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree, dated 07.01.2010 passed in A.S.No.17 of 2009 on the file of the leaned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Dindigul, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 15.11.2007 passed in O.S.No.158 of 2001 on the file of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Dindigul. For Petitioners : Mr.M.P.Senthil, For Respondents : Mr.M.R.Sreenivasan, for R2. : No Appearance, for R1. ORDER The above petitions have been filed (i) to condone the delay of 55 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the first respondent (ii) to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the first respondent and (iii) to bring on record the petitioners 3 and 4 legal representatives of the deceased first respondent and rank them as proposed respondents 3 and 4 in the above second appeal. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.(MD)No.11765, 11766 & 11767 of 2025 in S.A(MD)No.198 of 2015 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today (ie., 15.12.2025), the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that he may be permitted to withdraw these petitions and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 3.Permission is granted. These Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. 15.12.2025 NCC : Yes /No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No das To 1.The Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Dindigul. 2.The Additional Subordinate Judge, Dindigul. 3.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.(MD)No.11765, 11766 & 11767 of 2025 in S.A(MD)No.198 of 2015 K.MURALI SHANKAR,J. das C.M.P.(MD)Nos.11765, 11766 and 11767 of 2025 in S.A(MD)No.198 of 2015 Dated: 15.12.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis