KIRAN BALA AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/12990/2025 · 2025-08-12
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22825 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22825 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.12990 of 2025
Decided on: 12.08.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kiran Bala and Anr
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and Ors
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Ms. Sheetal Kaul and Mr. Naresh Kaul,
Advocates.
For the Respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. L.N.Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed a representation
dated 08.06.2025 (Annexure P-5) respondent No.3 for the redressal of their grievances raised in this writ petition. Petitioners’ grievance is that the representation preferred by
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 them for redressal of their grievances in light of settled legal position has not been adjudicated till date. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners would be content in case respondent No.3/competent authority is directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
4.
Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 12, 2025
Judge R.Atal