APHC010321892025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) pa % t o MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16467 OF 2025 Between: Smt.Sana Kavita, W/o. Late Raghuram, Aged. 48 years, Occ: Housewife, Srikakulam Town, R/o. Door No. 11-3-38/a, Chinna Baratam Street Srikakulam District. 2. Sana Bujji Babu, S/o. Narayana Murthy, Aged. 57 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Door No. 11-4-37, Chinna Baratam Street Srikakulam Town, Srikakulam District. ...Petitioners AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. 3. Inspector of Police, One Town Circle Police Station, Near Old Bus Stand, Srikakulam Srikakulam District. 4. Station House Officer, One Town Police Station Srikakulam Srikakulam District. 5. Arora Manoj Kumar, S/o. Lekh Raju, Aged. 49 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Haryana Handlooms, Srikakulam Town, Near Old Bus Stand Door No. 11-4-38, GT Road Srikakulam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondent 3 and 4 in interfering with civil disputes pending between the petitioners and the respondent and insisting the petitioners to settle the civil disputes with 5*^ respondent with respect to Shop bearing Door No. 11- 4-38, situated in GT Road, Srikakulam Town, Srikakulam District which is plaint schedule property in O.S.No.296 of 2024 on the file of Learned Principal Junior Civil Judge at Srikakulam, is illegal, arbitrary and without there being any authority of law as illegal, irregular, irrational, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere in civil disputes pending between the petitioners and 5 respondent and not to interfere with petitioners' personal liberty. th lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere with civil disputes pending between the petitioners and the respondent vide O.S.No.296 of 2024 on the file of Learned Principal Junior Civil Judge at Srikakulam and also not to interfere with the personal liberty, pending disposal of main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SRINIVAS AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order: APHC010321892025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WM [3457] MONDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16467/2025 Between: TSANA KAVITA, W/0 LATE RAGHURAM, AGED. 48 YEARS, OCC. R/0 DOOR NO. 11-3-38/A, CHINNA BARATAM HOUSEWIFE STREET, SRIKAKULAM TOWN, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2.SANA BUJJI BABU„ S/0 NARAYANA MURTHY, AGED. 57 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS STREET SRIKAKULAM TOWN, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. R/0 DOOR NO. 11-4-37, CHINNA BARATAM ...PETITIONER(S) AND PRINCIPAL HOME DEPARTMENT, 1.STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ONE TOWN CIRCLE POLICE STATION, NEAR OLD BUS STAND, SRIKAKULAM SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4.STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ONE TOWN POLICE STATION, NEAR OLD BUS STAND, SRIKAKULAM SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5.ARORA MANOJ KUMAR, S/0 LEKH RAJU, AGED. 49 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/0 DOOR NO. 11-4-38, GT ROAD, HARYANA HANDLOOMS, SRIKAKULAM TOWN, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.SRINIVAS AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- at the behest of the It is submitted that respondent Nos.3 and 4, 5*"^ respondent are interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the 5'" respondent. It is further submitted that the petitioners are the owners of the shop, which is taken on lease by the respondent. It is submitted that the 4 5*" respondent is insisting the petitioners to withdraw the eviction suit filed before the competent Court. Considering the submissions and after hearing the learned Assistant Government Pleader, there shall be a direction to respondent Nos.3 and 4 not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioners and the 5*" respondent and not to disturb the peace of the of the petitioners without following due process of law. >4 i Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order respondent, at the instance of the th 2. 3. 4. as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 'SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. 3. The Inspector of Police, One Town Circle Police Station, Near Old Bus Stand, Srikakulam Srikakulam District. 4. Station House Officer, One Town Police Station, Near Old Bus Stand, Srikakulam Srikakulam District. 5. One CC to Sri Srinivas Ambati, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies Cnr : -f HIGH COURT DATED:07/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 16467 OF 2025 5 ,? I m a)25 Sj >2,^ Current iecnon ^ '*=«4£esPATC>*^' DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS