APHC010321772025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) A O THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE 3 % PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16398 OF 2025 Between: 1. Kangala Praveena, D/o. Late K. Nagabhushanam, Aged about 33 years, R/o. D.No.1/2045 Prakashnagar, Kadapa City. 2. Kangala Muni Kumar, S/o. Late K. Nagabhushanam, Aged about 31 years, R/o. D.No.1/2045, Prakashnagar, Kadapa City. 3. Kangala Subash, S/o. Late K. Nagabhushanam, Aged about 30 years, R/o. D.No.1/2045 Prakashnagar, Kadapa City ...Petitioners - AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, A.P. 2. The Superintendent of police, Kadapa Town, Kadapa District. 3. The Circle Inspector, Kadapa I Town Police Station, Kadapa District. 4. The Sub Inspector, Kadapa I Town Police Station, Kadapa District. 5. Chintakunta Sarojamma, W/o. Jayarami Reddy, Aged about 62 years, R/o. D.No.l/19-A Kumarunipalli, Vallur Mandal, Kadapa District. ...Respondents ^ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order, writ or direction, more particularly one.^ r in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring respondents authorities in interfering with the civil and intimidating the petitioners not to the action of the 3RD and 4TH disputes and in threatening pursue the Appeal Suit pending on the file of Hon'ble Court of IV Additional District judge, Kadapa vide A.S No 20 of 2025 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 and 4 not to call the petitioners to the police Station. ««'- lA NO: 1 OF 7C)9Pi Petition under Section 151 CPC in the affidavit fiied in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to the direct the respondents No. praying that in the circumstances stated 3 and 4 not to interfere in the pending civil litigation in any manner whatsoever and to ensure that the petitioners are not subjected to coercion or obstruction in exercising their legal rights :district. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI ABDUL MATHEEN S -- Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR HOME^ Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : NONE APPEARED / The Court made the following order: APHC010321772025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16398/2025 Between: 1.KANGALA PRAVEENA, D/0 LATE K. NAGABHUSHANAM, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/0 D.NO.1/2045 PRAKASHNAGAR, KADAPA CITY. 2.KANGALA MUNI KUMAR,, S/0 LATE K. NAGABHUSHANAM, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/0 D.NO.1/2045, PRAKASHNAGAR, KADAPA CITY. 3.KANGALA SUBASH,, S/0 LATE K. NAGABHUSHANAM, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/0 D.NO.1/2045 PRAKASHNAGAR, KADAPA CITY ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA TOWN, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3.THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, KADAPA I TOWN POLICE STATION KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR, KADAPA I TOWN POLICE STATION, KADAPA DISTRICT. 5.CHINTAKUNTASAROJAMMA, W/0 JAYARAMI REDDY, AGED 2 ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/0 D.N0.1/19-A KUMARUNIPALLl, VALLUR MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate order, writ or particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the 3RD and 4TH respondents authorities in interfering with the civil disputes and in threatening and intimidating the petitioners not to pursue the Appeal Suit pending on the file of Hon'ble Court of IV Additional District judge, Kadapa vide A.S No 20 of 2025 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 and 4 not to call the petitioners to the police Station and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to the direct the respondents No. 3 and 4 not to interfere in the pending civil litigation in any manner whatsoever and to ensure that the petitioners are not subjected to coercion or obstruction in exercising their legal rights :district and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.ABDUL MATHEEN S Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GPFOR HOME direction, more 3 W The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners Government Pleader for Home and learned Assistant appearing for the respondents 1 to 4. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the 3 and 4 at behest of 5*^ respondent have respondents been repeatedly calling the petitioners to the police station and also interfering in civil dispute and also pressurizing not to pursue appeal suit vide A.S.No.20 of 2025 on the file of IV Additional District Judge, Kadapa. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, submits that, the 5*^ respondent has filed on written instructions, a complaint on 21.04.2025 against the petitioners and the petitioners were called to the police station only for the purpose of enquiry. It is submitted that the police after preliminary have found that the dispute between the petitioners and the S'" respondent is civil in nature and advised the 5»' respondent to adjudicate the disputes before the competent Civil Court. enquiry if any 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Abdul Matheen S. 2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra 3. Two CD Copies Advocate [OPUC] Pradesh [OdT] Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:03/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 16398 OF 2025 CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS