Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22816 (GAU)

Sh. R. Zomawia (Now Dead) R/b legal representative Smt. Lalrintluangi v. Sh. Zosangzuala Rokhum (Now Dead) R/b legal representative Smt. Lalthakimi and 2 Ors.

I.A.(Civil)/59/2025 · 2025-09-03

Yarenjungla Longkumer

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC030001812025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/59/2025 Sh. R. Zomawia (Now Dead) R/b legal representative Smt. Lalrintluangi W/o R. Zomawia (L) R/o H/No. U-1/I Dawrpui Bara Bazar Bungkawn Aizawl Mizoram. VERSUS Sh. Zosangzuala Rokhum (Now Dead) R/b legal representative Smt. Lalthakimi and 2 Ors. W/o Zosangzuala Rokhum (L) R/o KT. Khuma Building Dawrpui Bara Bazar Bungkawn Aizawl Mizoram. 2:The Secretary Land Revenue and Settlement Dept. Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl Mizoram. 3:The Director Land Revenue and Settlement Dept. Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl Mizoram. Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Lalfakawma Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA Page No.# 2/3 Mizoram for R2 & R3 In RFA/10/2025 Sh. R. Zomawia (Now Dead) S/o Khawtinkhuma alias K.T. Khuma (L), Represented by Legal Representative Smt. Lalrintluangi, W/o R. Zomawia (L), R/o H/No. U-1/I, Bara Bazar, Bungkawn, Dawrpui, Aizawl, Mizoram VERSUS Sh. Zosangzuala Rokhum (Now Dead) and 2 Ors. S/o Khawtinkhuma alias KT. Khuma (L), Represented by Legal Representative Smt. Lalthakimi, W/o Zosangzuala Rokhum (L), R/o K.T. Khuma Building, Bara Bazar, Bungkawn, Dawrpui, Aizawl, Mizoram 2:The Secretary Land Revenue and Settlement Department Government of Mizoram 3:The Director Land Revenue and Settlement Department Government of Mizoram Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Lalfakawma Advocate for the Respondent : Mr B Lalramenga for R-1 ORDER BEFORE HONORABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER 04.09.2025 The present application has been filed under Order 41 Rule 27 of the CPC by the appellant praying for submission of additional documents in the connected Regular First Appeal. The learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, Mr. B. Lalramenga is present and submits that he has no objection regarding the prayer made in the I.A. The Page No.# 3/3 learned Govt. Advocate, Mrs. Vanneihsiami appears for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and she also submits that she has no objection. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The applicant is allowed to submit the additional documents in the connected RFA. This application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant