[2025:RJ-JP:28796] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8327/2025 Ummed Singh S/o Shri Bhairu Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Rakhna, Post Kul Thana, Police Station Jaitpur, District Pali, Rajasthan, Currently Suspended Second Class Teacher Sub- ject Social Science, Deo Office Secondary Education, Sirohi. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajveer Singh Rajawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/07/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.58/2024 registered at Special Police Station (SOG), District ATS & SOG for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6, 7 & 10 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Measures for Prevention of Unfair Means In Recruitment) Act, 2022. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. As per prosecution case, a dummy candidate appeared on behalf of co- accused namely- Ashok Kumar in examination of PTI and in result, he was declared successful. It is submitted that there is allegation [2025:RJ-JP:28796] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8327/2025] against the petitioner that dummy candidate was arranged by him. It is submitted that co-accused persons namely Ashok Kumar and Sunil Kumar have been granted benefit of bail by this Court. Trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, so also considering the fact that aforementioned co-accused persons have been granted benefit of bail by this Court; trial will take time as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Ummed Singh S/o Shri Bhairu Singh, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve [2025:RJ-JP:28796] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8327/2025] in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observation made herein above is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /278