APHC010322252025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 16178 OF 2025 Between: Kadiri Suresh, S/o late K. Narasimhulu, aged 53 years, Working as Office Subordinate, reception section in AEO (R-l) Tirumala, R/o. D.No.5-106,NGO Colony, Puttur town Tirupati District ...PETITIONER AND 1. Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, rep. by its Administrative Buildings, Tirupati 2. The General Manager, Transport Department, TTD, Tirupati 3. Assistant Executive Officer (R-l), Reception section, TTD, Tirumala Executive Officer, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction, order or orders declaring the respondents herein in not consider his representation dt.09-05-2025 requesting them to transfer the petitioner to the Transport Department in the same cadre ie., driver cadre post and to sanction the increments under the 24 years of service on par with others as wholly arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction and void and violated the principles of natural justice and affected action of the 0 his rights guaranteed under article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, to direct the respondents to transfer him to the transport department under same cadre of drivers from existing post of Office Sub ordinate , Reception section , AEO-(R-I), Tirumala and to pay the basic salary on par with others who are under the cadre of drivers by consider his representation dt.09-05-2025. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation dt.09-05-2025 requesting them to transfer him to the Transport Department in same cadre of drivers from ‘office sub ordinate’ by paying the salary on par with others as well as increments under 24 years of service pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. ESWARAIAH CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: SRI SRINIVASA BABA, SC FOR TTD The Court made the following order; V> APHC010322252025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 16178/2025 Between: 1.KADIRI SURESH, S/0 LATE K. NARASIMHULU, AGED 53 YEARS, WORKING AS OFFICE SUBORDINATE, RECEIPTION SECTION IN AEO (R-L) TIRUMALA, R/0' D.NO.5-106,NGO COLONY, PUTTUR TOWN TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDINGS, TIRUPATI 2.THE GENERAL MANAGER, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT TIRUPATI TTD, 3.ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE OFFICER RL, RECEPTION SECTION, TTD, TIRUMALA ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.V ESWARAIAH CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: \a ORDER: 1. Heard arguments of Sri V.Eswaraiah Chowdary, learned counsel for writ petitioner and Sri C.Srinivasa Babu, learned Standing Counsel for respondents. Limited grievance in this writ petition is that petitioner’s representation dated 09.05.2025 is not being considered by respondent No.1. Petitioner 2. stated to have been appointed as driver initially in the year 1997 and later his services were regularized on 01.02.2000. However, due to the accident occurred on 16.11.2011, he lost right eye sight. Therefore, he was declared to be unfit for discharging the duties as driver. He was later provided with alternative post which is lower in the cadre as office sub-ordinate in reception. Petitioner claims that the present post was lower in cadre and pay scale was also less than what he was earning earlier in his initial post as driver. Therefore, he submitted a representation dated 09.05.2025 requesting to consider aforesaid aspect which is pending for consideration. Learned counsel submits that it would suffice to direct respondent No.1 to consider and pass appropriate orders on aforesaid representation dated 09.05.2025. 3. 4. Learned Standing Counsel for respondents submits that the request of petitioner will be considered in accordance with the law. 5. In view of the same, this writ petition is disposed of at admission stage without expressing any opinion on merits and with the consent of both the counsels by directing respondent No.1 to consider and pass appropriate orders by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 09.05.2025 strictly in accordance with the law within six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ■to^FFICER //TRUE COPY// SEC To, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Administrative 1. The Executive Officer Buildings, Tirupati General Manager, Transport Department, TTD, Tirupati Officer (R-l), Reception section. 2. The 3. The Assistant Executive TTD, Tirumala. 4. One CC to Sri V. Eswaraiah Chowdary, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri Srinivasa Baba, SC for TTD [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies ssb HIGH COURT DATED:03/07/2025 ORDER WP No.16178 OF 2025 OF AND/y/j,^ O'l' 15 Jill 2D?5 X’ e> Co/; . Curreni sieciion ^ DISPOSING OF THE W.P. AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS